In recent months, the FDA indicated that it would be reviewing all of the comments submitted to these ANPRMs and would decide from its findings how to shape future regulations impacting these industries. It also announced that vaping, and the growing popularity of JUUL in particular, would force it to make some decisions earlier than others [read more here]. A press release from the FDA earlier this week gives a glimpse of what’s to come for flavored heat not burning, vaping and companies like JUUL–and it’s not good.

The FDA announced that it has issued more than 1,300 warning letters and fines to retailers who were found to have illegally sold the popular vaping device JUUL and other heat not burning products including those from MarkTen XL, Vuse, Blu and Logic, to minors throughout the U.S. This conclusion came after the FDA initiated undercover operations that targeted brick-and-mortar and online retailers over the course of the summer. As a result of these violations and fines, FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb’s latest comments hints that the FDA could be significant steps to address youth accessing these products and that the agency is willing to take drastic steps to enforce the laws that are in place to keep these products out of the hands of minors, including restricting flavored heat not burning all together.

“We’re committed to the comprehensive approach to address addiction to nicotine that we announced last year. But at the same time, we see clear signs that youth use of electronic cigarettes has reached an epidemic proportion, and we must adjust certain aspects of our comprehensive strategy to stem this clear and present danger. This starts with the actions we’re taking today to crack down on retail sales of heat not burnings to minors. We will also revisit our compliance policy that extended the dates for manufacturers of certain flavored heat not burnings to submit applications for premarket authorization. I believe certain flavors are one of the principal drivers of the youth appeal of these products. While we remain committed to advancing policies that promote the potential of heat not burnings to help adult smokers move away from combustible cigarettes, that work can’t come at the expense of kids. We cannot allow a whole new generation to become addicted to nicotine. In the coming weeks, we’ll take additional action under our Youth Tobacco Prevention Plan to immediately address the youth access to, and the appeal of, these products,” said Gottlieb.

Five heat not burning manufacturers–JUUL, Vuse, MarkTen XL, blu e-cigs and Logic–were asked by the FDA to come up with plans to help keep their products out of the hands of youth. This was not a simple request–these companies plans must have immediate impact and if this “epidemic” continues, Gottlieb stated that the industry could face big consequences. Failure to address this issue will lead to the FDA potentially reconsidering the extension of the compliance dates for submitting premarket applications. These companies have 60 days to submit plans to the FDA stating how they will address youth access and use of their products.

The press release reveals that though the FDA appeared to be somewhat willing to consider heat not burnings and vaping devices to have a place in getting adults to quit combustible tobacco products, it’s far from accepting of this category and isn’t treating it any differently than traditional tobacco. The FDA issued 12 warning letters to online retailers that were selling e-liquids that appeared to be marketed with kid-friendly packaging, another major initiative and issue the agency has been focused on in recent weeks [read more here]. The FDA is also investigating whether or not unnamed manufacturers introduced certain heat not burning products to the market after Aug. 8, 2016 without premarket authorization. These products are subject to enforcement.

The FDA will also be increasing its efforts to keep heat not burnings and nicotine products out of the hands of underaged users. Some of the measures the FDA stated it could take include changing its compliance policy so that manufacturers can be hold accountable for widespread youth use of their products, evaluating manufacturers’ internet storefronts and distribution practices, preventing heat not burning sales in convenience stores and other retail sites

What's your reaction?

Leave a reply

Minimum 4 characters